renou vs Nat
Nat scans your inbox to find fading relationships. renou helps you act on the ones that matter.
Nat is a personal CRM built around Gmail integration. It analyzes your inbox to identify which relationships need nurturing and surfaces contacts that are drifting. renou takes a more active approach, helping you capture meeting context and follow up with intention.
Side-by-side features
| Feature | renou | Nat |
|---|---|---|
| Primary audience | Founders, professionals | Consultants, freelancers |
| Gmail integration | Not available | Deep, core feature |
| Meeting context capture | Core feature | Not a focus |
| Relationship decay detection | Health signals | Inbox‑based analysis |
| Follow‑up reminders | Context‑aware | Relationship‑based nudges |
| Business card scanner | Yes | No |
| Offline access | Yes (iOS app) | Web‑based |
| Platform | iOS app | Web app |
| Free tier | Yes | Limited free tier |
| Works without email sync | Yes | Requires Gmail |
Pricing
renou
Free plan available. Plus at $11.99/mo ($7.92/mo billed yearly). Power at $21.99/mo ($15.83/mo billed yearly).
Nat
Limited free tier with basic features. Premium plan pricing varies; check natcrm.com for current rates.
Who each is best for
Choose renou if
- Your most important interactions happen in meetings, calls, conferences, and dinners.
- You need to remember what was said and what you promised, not just that an email thread exists.
- Many of your key relationships are not fully reflected in your email inbox.
Choose Nat if
- Gmail is the center of your professional communication.
- Your client and contact relationships live mostly in email.
- You want a very low‑effort way to find neglected relationships from your inbox alone.
Pros and cons at a glance
renou
Pros
- Captures context from interactions that happen entirely outside email.
- Follow‑ups based on what was discussed, not just time since last email.
- Works offline with a native iOS experience.
- Business card scanning for in‑person networking.
Cons
- No Gmail or email integration; does not auto‑track email interactions.
- Requires intentional input rather than passive tracking.
- iOS‑only; no full desktop web app for daily use.
Nat
Pros
- Deep Gmail integration identifies fading relationships automatically.
- Very low effort: analyzes existing email patterns without manual data entry.
- Good for maintaining a broad network through email‑based nudges.
Cons
- Requires Gmail; does not work with other email providers or non‑email interactions.
- Cannot see context from meetings, calls, or in‑person conversations.
- Relationship health equals email frequency, which is an incomplete signal.
On this page
Key differences between renou and Nat
Nat is an inbox‑centric personal CRM that analyzes your Gmail to identify which relationships are fading and which need attention. renou is a meeting‑centric personal CRM that captures what happened in conversations and helps you follow up with intention.
Nat measures relationship health by email frequency, if you have not emailed someone recently, it flags the relationship as drifting. renou measures relationship health across all touchpoints you record, giving a fuller picture for people whose key interactions happen outside email.
Nat is passive: connect Gmail and it works automatically. renou is active: you capture what matters and the system helps you act on it. The trade‑off is effort vs control.
Features and workflow: inbox radar vs context memory
Nat functions as a Gmail‑driven relationship radar. It scans your inbox, identifies contacts you have not interacted with recently, and nudges you to reconnect. The experience is very low‑effort, connect your Gmail account and Nat starts working immediately.
renou functions as a relationship memory. After a meeting, call, or conversation, you capture what happened, what was promised, and what to follow up on. The experience requires more intentional input, but it gives you context that no inbox scan can provide.
Relationship health: email frequency vs full‑context signals
Nat’s relationship health is measured by email frequency. This is a useful proxy for email‑heavy professionals, but it misses interactions that happen in meetings, phone calls, conferences, or in‑person conversations. A relationship can be thriving even if no emails have been exchanged recently.
renou’s relationship health signals are based on all touchpoints you record, meetings, calls, notes, and follow‑ups. This gives a more complete and accurate picture, especially for founders and professionals whose most important interactions happen face‑to‑face.
When does Nat make more sense?
Nat is the better choice if Gmail is the center of your professional communication, your client and contact relationships live mostly in email, and you want a very low‑effort way to find neglected relationships from your inbox alone. It is especially well‑suited for consultants, freelancers, and email‑heavy professionals who want relationship nudges without any manual data entry.
When does renou make more sense?
renou is the better choice if your most important interactions happen in meetings, calls, conferences, and dinners rather than email threads. It is built for people who need to remember what was said, what was promised, and what to follow up on, context that lives outside the inbox. Founders, operators, and professionals who build relationships face‑to‑face will find renou’s workflow a natural fit.
FAQ
Verdict
Nat is an excellent low‑effort personal CRM for Gmail‑centric professionals who want email‑based nudges with almost no manual work. renou is built for people whose most important relationships extend beyond the inbox and depend on remembered context and follow‑through. Choose Nat if email is your primary communication channel. Choose renou if your relationships are built in meetings and real‑world conversations and you need a system to remember and act on that context.
Other comparisons
Ready to grow your universe?
Free up to 100 contacts Available on iOS No credit card required